[PATCH 0/3] powerpc: Instrument Hypervisor Calls
arnd at arndb.de
Sun Jul 16 02:42:26 EST 2006
On Saturday 15 July 2006 17:30, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > What happened to the question whether to use PURR values for also measuring
> > cycles spent executing the hcall as opposed to cycles that passed before
> > the hcall returns. Did that turn out not giving extra information after all
> > or was there a different reason to drop that idea?
> You have to be careful with PURR since it may be context switched
> between partitions.
Not sure I follow you. I would expect the PURR value to be restored after
a context switch, even if we continue on a different physical CPU.
The idea behind monitoring both PURR and timebase is that the difference
between the two tells you how long the partition was suspended during
More information about the Linuxppc-dev