[PATCH] powerpc: consolidate mpc83xx platform files
Geoff Thorpe
Geoff.Thorpe at freescale.com
Thu Dec 14 04:48:47 EST 2006
'day,
I'm inclined to defer to the maintainer's prerogative of judging the
acceptability of code. :-) Thanks for responding.
However I have a couple of little responses regarding other matters;
Kumar Gala wrote:
> There are a number of subtle reasons I think a generic port is
> pointless and the only arguments I've heard are some concern about
> duplication of code and the ability to boot a kernel w/o modification
> on new HW.
To each their own "concern" I guess. "Duplication of code and the
ability to boot a kernel w/o modification on new HW" both seem like
pretty legitimate concerns to me. That this may or may not be acceptable
on a technical level should be the focus, but it seems irrational to
presume to stipulate what interests/concerns other hackers should and
should not have? This is linux, not windows.
> The duplication code I believe is a style issue and we can reduce the
> duplication to a minimum. The ability to boot a kernel w/o
> modification on new HW is a nice to have, but I dont see this as
> providing any "real value".
Same comment.
> I'd rather see people spending time on problems which need solutions
> and this isn't one of them.
Um, with all due respect. You are invoking what could only be described
as "employer's privilege". I doubt the concern here came purely from
someone having nothing better to do and being totally lost for ideas. No
doubt they'll correct me if I'm wrong :-)
I have no comment on your technical objections, only the(se)
non-technical one(s).
(Seasonal) cheers,
Geoff
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list