[PATCH] powerpc: consolidate mpc83xx platform files
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Dec 13 11:23:24 EST 2006
On Dec 12, 2006, at 4:40 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> What's the issue with a file per board if all it has is the
>> ppc_md/ define_machine() in it. Someone explain to me why this is
>> a bad thing?
>
> It requires that the kernel be changed even when a new board
> doesn't require that the kernel actually *do* anything
> differently. It's gratuitous duplication, even if the bit being
> duplicated is small.
But at least someone had to think about the duplication and it
provides remove for customization if its needed in the future.
> Why is a single ppc_md, which no board is forced to use, but can be
> used by any board without special requirements, a bad thing?
It adds code to all those people that don't need it just so we don't
duplicate a few lines of source code.
- k
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list