[PATCH] powerpc: consolidate mpc83xx platform files
Kim Phillips
kim.phillips at freescale.com
Wed Dec 13 09:24:16 EST 2006
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:06:41 -0600
Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > I do prefer the middle ground approach he (and you) proposed to
> > have an
> > "mpc83xx_generic" in the compatible property and match on that, but
> > I'm
> > not 100% certain we are really there yet and I would have been a bit
> > more comfortable limiting that to known fsl boards. But you are the
> > guys
> > to maintain those things, so do as you like there.
>
> I'm against the idea of "mpc83xx_generic" if they want to introduce a
> "mpc83xx_freescale" or "mpc83xx_fsl_generic" I'm fine with that, but
> there is not such thing as a "mpc83xx_generic".
I took a look at the TQM8349 code, and it looks like it will be identical in the platform code space. That would subtract the 'fsl' part from the equation. How about 'mpc83xx_eval'? btw, this would be taking us back to the original patch, which I like since I personally don't want to see one file per eval board (I could ifdef protect platforms in machdefs.c if that works for you).
Kim
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list