[PATCH] powerpc: consolidate mpc83xx platform files

Kim Phillips kim.phillips at freescale.com
Wed Dec 13 09:24:16 EST 2006


On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:06:41 -0600
Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> 
> > I do prefer the middle ground approach he (and you) proposed to  
> > have an
> > "mpc83xx_generic" in the compatible property and match on that, but  
> > I'm
> > not 100% certain we are really there yet and I would have been a bit
> > more comfortable limiting that to known fsl boards. But you are the  
> > guys
> > to maintain those things, so do as you like there.
> 
> I'm against the idea of "mpc83xx_generic" if they want to introduce a  
> "mpc83xx_freescale" or "mpc83xx_fsl_generic" I'm fine with that, but  
> there is not such thing as a "mpc83xx_generic".

I took a look at the TQM8349 code, and it looks like it will be identical in the platform code space.  That would subtract the 'fsl' part from the equation.  How about 'mpc83xx_eval'?  btw, this would be taking us back to the original patch, which I like since I personally don't want to see one file per eval board (I could ifdef protect platforms in machdefs.c if that works for you).

Kim



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list