On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 14:25:04 +0100 Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote: > But 0 _is_ a valid PCI I/O address. Do we now have to start > using "virtual I/O addresses", analogue to the IRQ situation, > or can these bad assumptions be fixed instead? Send patches to Bartlomiej now he is back in circulation. Alan