[PATCH] Fix powerpc 44x_mmu build
jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Sun Aug 6 02:33:49 EST 2006
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 09:11 -0400, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:12:22PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 11:44 -0500, Matt Porter wrote:
> > > The PIN_SIZE definition name changed, update 44x_mmu.c accordingly.
> > As far as I know, 4xx still builds as ARCH=ppc... is this patch just
> > something you noticed, or is it a hint that you're working on moving 4xx
> > to arch/powerpc?
> Yes, working on moving 4xx to arch/powerpc.
> > Just curious, since I've been poking at this a bit and would rather not
> > duplicate effort.
> Sounds great. In fact, I talked to BenH and tgall at ols about this
> and they mentioned you were doing some work. These patches are
> just some obvious basic things to get started.
> Since there's a lot of work here, what aspect are you working on?
> I haven't seen anything publicly but hear plenty of talk of people
> working on dt soc definitions for 4xx i/o blocks.
At the moment, I'm mostly trying to sit down and figure out the whole
device tree stack. That, and keep up with the irq rework BenH did. I
won't really be digging in for another couple weeks, but then I hope to
start actually doing something.
> I'm currently looking at merging ocotea but am using it to focus
> on a few fundamental things like merging over a version of the
> non-coherent DMA API implementation. The plan here is to get
> a serial-only port merged and then sync with whoever is working
> on the definitions and driver changes for the essential drivers
> (obviously emac first from my POV).
That sounds like a good plan. I know a guy already working on emac, but
it's a bit of a unique setup he's got. I'll try and get some patches
out of him soon.
>From talking with BenH, we'd also need the dt-in-zImage patches that are
floating around. Anybody know what's going on with those?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev