RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources?

[Tom Rini]

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:32:33AM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:

> I don't think we need to bump the dt version every time we make a tree
> content requirements change.  We need to bump when we add or
> change fields in the struct header, change internal layout, or change how
> we pass  information through the tree.  Certianly not because someone 
> left things out of their tree.

But "content requirements change" isn't the same as "left things out of
their tree".  It sounds, and I haven't seen the changes, so I'm not
certain that the meaning behind a field changed.  Something like that
should change the dt version.  New fields aren't a problem.  Changing
existing fields meaning in incompatible ways is a problem.

-- 
Tom Rini