RFC: Location for Device Tree Sources?
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Aug 3 23:54:40 EST 2006
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:32:33AM -0500, Milton Miller wrote:
> I don't think we need to bump the dt version every time we make a tree
> content requirements change. We need to bump when we add or
> change fields in the struct header, change internal layout, or change how
> we pass information through the tree. Certianly not because someone
> left things out of their tree.
But "content requirements change" isn't the same as "left things out of
their tree". It sounds, and I haven't seen the changes, so I'm not
certain that the meaning behind a field changed. Something like that
should change the dt version. New fields aren't a problem. Changing
existing fields meaning in incompatible ways is a problem.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev