FT u-boot shim
Tom Rini
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Apr 29 09:22:11 EST 2006
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 01:07:20AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Tom,
>
> in message <20060428194457.GA458 at smtp.west.cox.net> you wrote:
> >
> > > > 3. using a u-boot that is ft aware + built in dtb.
> ...
> > > Assuming we had 2., under which circumstances would we need 3. then?
> >
> > Especially if we had mkuimage let you tack your dtb into the 'kernel'
> > image.
>
> Sorry, but I don't understand. If we have the dtb combined with the
> kernel image, then why would we need another copy of the dtb built
> into U-Boot?
You wouldn't have the dtb combined in the kernel image, unless you have
the shim. This is instead of loading a separate dtb anyhow.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list