[PATCH] Wire up *at syscalls

[David Woodhouse]

On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 17:31 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Nice idea, but you didn't change the syscall entry path to multiply
> the syscall number by 24 instead of 16. 

Indeed. Neither did I wire up the spu callbacks. It wasn't meant to be
applied as-is.

>  It would be nice to have a way to do something like that but generate
> two separate tables instead of a single table with 3 entries per
> syscall. 

Arnd apparently tried that once and it was icky. Perhaps we could do
something like this though...

.macro SPU adr
	.section .spu_callbacks,"a"
	.llong \adr		
	.previous
.endm

-- 
dwmw2