FT u-boot shim
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Thu Apr 27 00:37:09 EST 2006
On Apr 25, 2006, at 5:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message
> <DAD4396E-7458-471C-8150-9DDCD396BA63 at kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>>> No. Remove them from the U-Boot tree. I was never happy to see
>>> stuff there.
>> Then why did you accept the patches for them? I'm confused on what
> Because I had neither time nor nerves to discuss with kernel
> maintainers how this could be done. Several people asked me again and
> again to accept these patches because they were vital for FDT
> support, so I gave in.
>> you see as the solution for how to boot an arch/powerpc kernel going
> I strongly agree with Dan and Eugene: the kernel should not depend on
> any specific version of a boot loader, and more general not even on
> any specific boot loader at all.
I think thats part of the idea with arch/powerpc defining a standard
mechanism for how a boot loader should pass information to the kernel
(via a flat device tree).
How would you propose that we handle booting arch/powerpc kernels
from u-boot going forward? (for new board ports and existing board
More information about the Linuxppc-dev