[PATCH 0/7] [RFC] Sizing zones and holes in an architecture independent manner V2

[Luck, Tony]

> Double counted a hole here, then went downhill. Does the following fix
> it?

Yes, that boots.  What's more the counts of pages in DMA/Normal
zone match the kernel w/o your patches too.  So for tiger_defconfig
you've now exactly matched the old behaivour.

I'll try to test generic and sparse kernels later, but I have to
look at another issue now.

-Tony