[PATCH] powerpc: Add FSL CPM2 device tree node documentation
Paul Nasrat
pnasrat at redhat.com
Thu Apr 13 15:14:56 EST 2006
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 18:19 -0500, Andy Fleming wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2006, at 10:55, Paul Nasrat wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 20:14 +0400, Vitaly Bordug wrote:
> >> + - address : List of bytes representing the ethernet address of
> >> + this controller
> >
> > Umm should we not use local-mac-address and mac-address (and
> > address-bits) as in section 3.7.4 in 1275-1994?
>
>
> So no one chimed in on this. Clearly, 1275 states that it's supposed
> to be local-mac-address or mac-address. We use "address". But I'm
> pretty sure we copied our ethernet node from somewhere else, so which
> one should it be?
Well I'm biased and say we shouldn't reinvent the wheel with dtc if we
don't need to. I've sent Jon a patch to start validating this for dtc
and am waiting feedback before I add additional device_types. So we
should have local-mac-address be preassiged hwaddr and mac-address last
used. For some setups this would be the same persistently, but I can
envisage some non OF setups populating mac-address from the card.
Paul
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list