[PATCH] Make ARCH=ppc build again with new syscall path

[Eugene Surovegin]

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 01:45:48PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> What do people think?  Do we make ARCH=ppc use more and more stuff
> from arch/powerpc, and delete the duplicates from arch/ppc, or do
> people want to be conservative and keep arch/ppc largely unchanged?
> (I would prefer the former, myself.)

I thought initial idea was to keep arch/ppc mostly unchanged (we are in 
"stable" series after all :), and migrate code to arch/powerpc when 
it's ready.

Personally, the amount of PPC/PPC64 changes in 2.6 make me nervous, 
looks like I'll stick with 2.4 longer than I thought for production.

-- 
Eugene