asm-ppc/page.h vs asm-powerpc/page.h

[Michael Ellerman]

My original patch removed it, so Paulus must have kept if for some good 
reason.

asm-powerpc/page.h probably should have page_to_virt, I'm not sure why I took 
it out :?

cheers

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:01, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Guys, what's going on here.
>
> Why haven't we removed asm-ppc/page.h?
>
> When I build ARCH=powerpc I get asm-powerpc/page.h, which doesn't build on
> 85xx since page_to_virt is missing.
>
> Any reason we are keeping around asm-ppc/page.h and causing this
> confusion?
>
> - kumar

-- 
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs

email: michael:ellerman.id.au
inmsg: mpe:jabber.org
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20051115/2d2e75c3/attachment.pgp>