2.6.14 USB vs. sleep issues
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Sat Nov 5 08:48:31 EST 2005
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 20:32 +0100, Vivenzio Pagliari wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > I would say your first mistake is to use PREEMPT :) There are various
> > issues with PREEMPT on ppc32 that have not really been addressed so far,
> > and the USB code has some "holes" that I wouldn't trust in a PREEMPT
> > environment.
> What do you mean exactly? Should CONFIG_PREEMPT not be used?
> And what about CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY?
I would avoid both for now.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev