boot time scheduling hile atomic
Takeharu KATO
kato.takeharu at jp.fujitsu.com
Thu Mar 17 11:46:09 EST 2005
Hi Benjamin:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> There may be other kernel bits calling syscall, it sounds saner to
> always make sure we don't reschedule when in atomic (though it's dubious
> that it's allowed to do syscalls in atomic regions, let's be safe
> there).
>
> In fact, we are thinking about consolidating the syscall return path and
> the normal irq return path like we did on ppc64.
>
Thkans, I make sense.
Would you send me Paul's patch?
Regards,
--
Takeharu KATO
Fujitsu Limited
Email:kato.takeharu at jp.fujitsu.com
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list