[PATCH] ppc32: Rework power management take #3
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Jun 3 09:06:58 EST 2005
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 15:33 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> I had a problem when building for ppc440 (gcc -m405). I wonder if we
> need some conditionals on the DSSALL statement as below, or is DSSALL
> intended to be a perprocessor macro that would expand to a blank line
> in this case?
No, but the cpu feature bit will make the dssall be nop'ed out on your
CPU. I though we were passing -many to gas in all cases, don't we ?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev