Linux process ABI broken in 2.6?

[Joakim Tjernlund]

> 
> Joakim Tjernlund writes:
> 
> > Is it too much trouble to define r7 to always have
> > a zero
> > value at process startup?
> 
> That's not much trouble, but what will you do for existing kernels?
> Won't you have to do something like testing *r1 anyway?

No, I don't plan to do anything. I just got the first report that static
uClibc apps dosen't work for 2.6, so if the current kernel is fixed I
will just
point to a newer kernel or they can patch their old kernel with the
required 2 line fix.

 Thanks
         Jocke

> 
> Paul.
> 
>