RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure
kumar.gala at freescale.com
Fri Aug 12 12:34:57 EST 2005
On Aug 11, 2005, at 6:19 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:07:03PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> I think this causes confusion. the reason we suggested pq2 and
>> classic32 was to handle things like sandpoint. Sandpoint would live
>> in classic32. The confusion partial comes from the fact that we can
>> run 8240/1/5 on a Sandpoint. The thinking was everything that was
>> 6xx/7xx/74xx + things like 8240/1/5 which can be thought of as 603 +
>> 10x bridge would be classic32.
> Thanks for the explanation. But I think this is overkill for the
> sandpoint or true like a sandpoint (Zynx something, Willow, neither of
> which are in the kernel tree). I think we can field the "I wanna hack
> on my Sandpoint/8240, but don't see the code under 82xx/!"
> question. :)
So where do you suggest Sandpoint goes in this directory structure?
More information about the Linuxppc-dev