RFC: proposed arch/powerpc directory structure
kumar.gala at freescale.com
Fri Aug 12 06:13:30 EST 2005
On Aug 11, 2005, at 2:59 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:45:10AM -0500, Becky Bruce wrote:
>> - platform-specific code laid out in the following
>> pmac/ (both 32 and 64-bit)
>> classic32/ (platforms containing
>> classic64/ (Maple?)
> I'm a bit ppc64-ignorant, but isn't 'pSeries' just a regular
> OpenFirmware-containing ppc64 box (like Maple) ? How about just 9xx/
> for all of the ppc64's that have a 9xx in them (Maple), that aren't
> (which is a class of its own).
>> 83xx/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point)
>> 86xx/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point)
>> pq2/ (may collapse into classic 32 at some point)
> PQ2 is the marketing name for 82xx, lets just call it 82xx.
The problem is that PQ2 describes a subset of 82xx (it nots
> I don't like the idea of sticking subdirs in classic32/ either, but
> can't think of a better name for the catchall of 7xx and 74xx boards.
I dont think we where planning on subdirs in classic32.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev