[PATCH] fix typo in binutils version check

Tom Rini trini at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Jun 8 01:57:02 EST 2004


On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 01:11:35PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
>  On Sat, Jun 05, Christian Kujau wrote:
>
> >
> > Olaf Hering wrote:
> > | The binutils check is bogus, it doesnt work with the just released
> > | binutils.
> >
> > why is this check bogus then? i tried to compile a kernel with some
> > recent binutils which didn't pass the test - compilation failed.
> > H.J.Lu's binutils [1] are working quite well, the releases from redhat
> > [2] seem to produce these results you wrote about.
>
> The checkbin target fails with current binutils cvs, you need an
> additional option like -many

IMHO, binutils CVS is broken, and -many shouldn't be needed.  But that's
not the direction things are heading apparently.

But I believe that when Paul talked about this with some of the binutils
folks it was decided that we should add -many to the AFLAGS so the
kernel won't have to care about this.  So can you add -many to the
AFLAGS, and make the binutils check use $(AFLAGS) as well?  Thanks.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/





More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list