rs/6000 e30 + 240 (doral) support
barbieri at gmail.com
Fri Jul 30 00:24:35 EST 2004
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 16:16:31 +0200, Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 11:04:48AM -0300, Gustavo Barbieri wrote:
> > > Most doesn't look too bad to me, but it's a lot of patches. I vaguely
> > > remember they were discussed on linuxppc-dev, so we should check the
> > > comments over there.
> > A lot of patches? Well, there is a lot of "code"... it's not really
> > code, but just structure definitions... actually the patche touches
> > the real code at few points, one it's just a null pointer checking,
> > other are added cases to the switch statement so it can handle those
> > boards, so I really can't a problem there.
> > I already sent an email to linuxppc-dev in the past, but no replies:
> > http://lists.linuxppc.org/linuxppc-dev/200407/msg00085.html
> Ah sorry, I confused it with Len's big IBM prep patchkit. Except for a
> tiny style issue this patch is fine with me.
What style issue?
> Any upstream comments as I'd hate to carry along a patch like that in
> the Debian patchkit while we'd probably want it in Sarge.
> Gustavo, if we apply this patch you'll have to sign up for d-i testing
> on prep, though ;-)
Ok, I test... actually I'm using sarge on that machine.
But I need to test it soon, as this machine may go away in few weeks.
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
Computer Engineer 2001 - UNICAMP
GPSL - Grupo Pro Software Livre
Cell..: +55 (19) 9165 8010
Jabber: gsbarbieri at jabber.org
GPG: 0xB640E1A2 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev