ppc826x BAD interrupts
Muhammad Sarwar
msarwar at mangrovesystems.com
Sat Jan 17 03:29:51 EST 2004
This problem was discussed on mailing list before also and you can eliminate this problem by inserting a sync instruction at a certain place in the 8260 interrupt handling code. See, for example, http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/8358/2002/11/100/10173445/
Add a __asm__ volatile("sync"); at the end of the m8260_mask_and_ack function in arch/ppc/kernel/ppc8260_pic.c to fix it.
Regards,
Muhammad Sarwar
Mangrove Systems Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Angielski [mailto:jeff at theptrgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 11:03 AM
To: linuxppc-dev at lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: ppc826x BAD interrupts
Looking at /proc/interrupts, I see a large number of "BAD" interrups on
both my MPC8260 reference board (2.4.21) and my PPC8266 custom board
(2.4.23). Both use u-boot as the bootloader.
bash-2.05# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0
24: 0 8260 SIU Edge PCI IRQ demux
33: 2658326944 8260 SIU Edge fenet
40: 32524 8260 SIU Edge uart
41: 0 8260 SIU Edge uart
BAD: 8862006 <<====== this the problem
The source of this count is ppc_spurious_interrupts which is incremented
in the arch/ppc/kernel/irq.c if:
1) there is no interrupt handler installed
2) SIVEC is showing zero (no interrupts pending)
Looking into the problem it would appear that the problem is the later
case and the get_irq() function in ppc8260_pic.c is indeed reading a
zero from the SIVEC.
The questions I have are:
1) Has anybody seen this behavior on their PowerPC platform?
2) Does anybody know why the SIVEC would be showing a zero?
TIA,
Jeff Angielski
The PTR Group
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list