Problems with dma_alloc_coherent()
ebs at ebshome.net
Fri Apr 2 05:17:15 EST 2004
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 02:10:00PM -0500, John Whitney wrote:
> >I think we should use "device" parameter passed to DMA API for such
> >stuff, it
> >already has a member "struct bus_type* bus".
> This effectively makes the DMA API a superset of the PCI DMA API (the
> DMA API would recognize a PCI device, and handle it accordingly)?
Yes, I think it's a goal.
> sounds like a good solution to me, although I'd like to see the
> "device" structure get that DMA offset I mentioned, so the DMA API
> wouldn't have to have a special case for each new bus-type added (PLB,
> PCI, OCP, CPM, whatever), as it does now for PCI vs. non-PCI. (That
> assumes bus offset is the only difference that needs to be handled...)
I think we should add such info to a structure which describes the _bus_, not
I'm not "new-device-model" guru, so I cannot comment _how_ this can be
implemented though :)
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev