Proposed Kconfig update patch for help text)
wd at denx.de
Fri Apr 2 04:56:51 EST 2004
In message <20040401171956.GD26876 at smtp.west.cox.net> you wrote:
> > So far, it's all we have, right? Or do you have anything significant-
> > ly better?
> As I said, someone is working on the second option I described, but I
> don't know how far they have gotten.
Is this a secret or what? Why don't you give names? Why doesn't he
show up on this list?
> 2.6 support, without the Motorola code. If there's a specific person at
> Motorola who'd be interested in what the Linux community has to say
> about the DMA code, no one has told me who.
You are not working on this, or are you?
> > Also, isn't this kind of wasted effort as the target is still moving?
> What target? The Motorola code? The 5xxx hw line? If you're talking
The Motorola code, and to some extend the hardware.
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
How does a project get to be a year late? ... One day at a time.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev