Proposed Kconfig update patch for help text

[Kumar Gala]

Also, what about 52xx?
- kumar

On Apr 1, 2004, at 2:35 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

>
> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, John Whitney wrote:
>> We can put in "8xx", but I didn't think that the listed processors was
>> supposed to be an exhaustive list (just some examples).   Shall we
>> just
>> prune them down to "8xx", "4xx", etc.?
>
> While you're at it, perhaps s/7400/74xx/ for consistency, too?
>
>> On Mar 31, 2004, at 6:06 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> In message <B755A2F6-8364-11D8-9FF0-000A95A07384 at sands-edge.com> you
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A couple of trivial changes for the processor choice help text to
>>>> make it a bit clearer.
>>> ...
>>>>        types (601, 603, 604, 740, 750, 7400), the Motorola embedded
>>>> -     versions (821, 823, 850, 855, 860, 8260), the IBM embedded
>>>> versions
>>>> +     versions (821, 823, 850, 855, 860, 82xx), the IBM embedded
>>>
>>> How about types like 857, 862, the 866 family, the 885 family, ... ?
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> 						Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> geert at linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a
> hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something
> like that.
> 							    -- Linus Torvalds
>


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/