New 745x errata

Giuliano Pochini pochini at
Tue Nov 18 19:40:39 EST 2003

On 17-Nov-2003 Adrian Cox wrote:
> On closer reading, I now think this problem may be harmless - see my
> explanation to Gabriel Paubert for more details.

The errata says: "For protection violation case only [...]". IMHO it
seems to imply that all other cases are not affected. But it's not as
clear as it should be.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list