New 745x errata
pochini at shiny.it
Tue Nov 18 19:40:39 EST 2003
On 17-Nov-2003 Adrian Cox wrote:
> On closer reading, I now think this problem may be harmless - see my
> explanation to Gabriel Paubert for more details.
The errata says: "For protection violation case only [...]". IMHO it
seems to imply that all other cases are not affected. But it's not as
clear as it should be.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev