paubert at iram.es
Wed Nov 12 22:41:14 EST 2003
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:59:59AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > In message <Pine.GSO.4.21.0311121029220.885-100000 at waterleaf.sonytel.be> you wrote:
> > >
> > > > We have drivers/i2c/i2c-algo-8xx.c, so maybe we should have
> > > > i2c-algo-5xxx.c instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.c ?
> > > >
> > > > There is include/linux/i2c-algo-8xx.h - how about
> > > > i2c-algo-5xxx.h instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.h ?
> > ...
> > > What's done in include/asm-ppc/ isn't that important for the
> > > outside (non-PPC) world, but i2c-algo-5xxx.c may be a too generic
> > > name...
> > Which name do you recommend to cover the MGT5100 and MPC5200 (and
> > probably other MPC5xxx) processors?
> i2c-algo-m5xxx.c, like the original?
Hmmm, dont't repeated x have a tendency to trigger spam filters
(especially the dumbest ones)?
Why not 5nnn or 5xyz?
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev