ppc: Update to ppc specific makefiles

Tom Rini trini at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Mar 18 01:03:04 EST 2003

On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 09:56:36PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 01:21:48PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> [Tom's original reply will not show up at linuxppc-dev becasue my initial
> mail contained the wrong address, and I just bounced it to linuxppc-dev]
> > > The kernel builds and when a rebuild is made no files are compiled again.
> > > arch/ppc/boot/{openfirmware,prep,simple}/Makefile could use more
> > > attention - but wanted to see this applied first.
> >
> > I'm open to ideas for how to clean those up.  Please CC me with those
> > (I'll read it quicker, most likley :)
> I will give the most simple one a spin then [prep].
> Hold on applying this for a while.

I'll wait for the next one. :)

> > Maybe I'm missing something, but won't this cause all of host-progs to
> > be compiled on any build?  They're small / quick enough to build that I
> > suppose it wouldn't kill anyone to build extra tools they don't need,
> > but in that case, the tools- stuff could die in arch/ppc/boot/Makefile,
> > right?
> It is rather me who missed something I'm afraid.
> The Makefile in ppc/boot/utils is not needed at all and can be deleted.
> The "host-prog := " in ppc/boot/Makefile is all what is needed.
> [tools/ shall be removed from subdir- := in boot/makefile]
> I would like to delete all the tool selection stuff in boot/Makefile.
> As you say it does not matter for the total build time.
> OK with you?

In the name of code cleanliness, yes, lets just build 'em all.

Tom Rini

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list