On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 03:38:53PM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote: > - li r9,0x0000 > + li r9,0x000c > mtlr r9 > blr Why not "ba 0x000c" instead? Just saves 8 bytes cheaply. Gabriel ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/