[patch] ignore trackpad/mouse while typing
Vojtech Pavlik
vojtech at suse.cz
Tue Jan 28 09:00:34 EST 2003
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 10:49:24PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> On Monday 27 January 2003 20:25, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 08:16:24PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> > > Hmm, this reminds me of one feature I would need in the input core to
> > > support 1-button mices in userspace (or at least in a totally
> > > self-contained module), namely the ability to register "filters" that are
> > > called early in input_event() and where a return value !=0 lets it return
> > > immediately from input_event() without processing the event.
> > >
> > > Eg. something along these lines:
> > >
> > > ret = 0;
> > > list_for_each_entry(filter, &dev->f_list, d_node)
> > > if (filter->open)
> > > ret |= filter->handler->event(handle, type, code,
> > > value);
> > > if (ret) return;
> > >
> > > Comments?
> >
> > I don't think I want this. This *can* be solved completely in userspace,
> > the only problem would be that the interface to the userspace program
> > doing it wouldn't be the same as to evdev.c, and that the kernel *dev.c
> > modules could not bind to do it.
> >
> > For mice, there is no problem - the mouse protocol can be implemented
> > over a bidirectional pipe.
> >
> > For making another evdev device, you can use uinput.
>
> Coding a uinput solution brought up this request. Basically there are 2
> methods to support 1-button mice:
>
> 1. remap 2 keys on the keyboard to middle and right button
> 2. remap the left mouse button with SHIFT/CTRL/ALT/etc
>
> Currently theres the ugly hack that does 1. in the kernel. Now, just for ease
> of explanation, lets go with a "clean" kernel module. So I register the
> module as a handler for keyboard and 1-button mice events and additionally
> register it as mouse input device. For case 1. I remapped F11 and F12 to
> middle and right mouse button, I see a F11, and submit a "middle mouse
> button" event. All nice so far, but how do I prevent F11 and F12 reaching
> other handlers in the list and potentially confusing the applications? If I
> implement case 2. the problem is essentially the same, except that I have to
> prevent the "left mouse button" event to reach other handlers.
>
> If I do it in userspace via uinput the underlying problem remains the
> same.
>
> Do you have better ideas to solve that in a clean and generic way besides my
> "filter idea"?
Idea 1: Implement a input_grab() function and ioctl for evdev that'd
stop passing any events to anyone else than the handler who called it.
This would allow userspace programs to do a grab() as well. Not much
better than your filter idea, though.
Idea 2: Leave the devices sending events to everyone, but configure the
handlers to only connect to the correct devices. This would be best,
however, since keyboard.c automatically listens to every keyboard and
/dev/input/mice to every mouse, it is next to impossible.
Idea 3: Someone suggested that handlers should have a priority value and
be passed events from the top priority to bottom, where any of them
could say 'don't pass to others'. This, however doesn't work too well if
you have two such filters which both want 'top priority'.
I think I'll implement 1, but still I'm reluctant to do it, since I
believe 2 would be the correct one.
--
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list