linuxppc_2_5 vs. linuxppc-2.5

benh at kernel.crashing.org benh at kernel.crashing.org
Tue May 14 01:50:33 EST 2002


>Is one of these BitKeeper trees now obsolete? The webpage on
>www.penguinppc.org has been partially updated to specify linuxppc-2.5.
>(originally linuxppc_2_5)

The _2_5 is obsolete, we keep it around for the history

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/





More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list