EV-64260-BP & GT64260 bi_recs
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Mar 25 04:18:03 EST 2002
>>BTW, I just thought of something different: some people want to keep data
>>stored in bi_recs for later use, after the initialization of the
>>about a new tag to mark data that is to be copied and stored for later use?
>Currently, I plan to keep everything. Though if we decide to put some
>flag bits in the high part of the size field, we could specify what
>to keep and what to strip.
Ok, rather that hacking flag bits, which I want to avoid, what about
that: we define an optional BI_PERSISTENT tag. Any bi_rec _before_
that tag is lost after __init (typically cmdline, initrd, informations
used in *_setup). Any bi_rec after this tag is kept around. Tyîcally,
this means those bi_recs are copied to separate pages (this will
typically be BI_DEVICE recs). If you want, you can put them before
BI_PERSISTENT and build your drivers in. If you prefer using modules,
you can put your BI_DEVICE entries after it.
An important point about bi_recs is that they shouldn't contain
pointers to other things within bi_recs. They can (and will) be
moved around, so unless explicitely defined (like initrd ptrs),
no pointers in bi_recs.
Again, all of this is just a small superset of the existing mecanism
with a few utiliy functions for kernel code and drivers to locate
bi_rec's by tag, either globally or within another bi_rec (that
is typically BI_DEVICE). The point is that once this is coded, I
expect bd_t & other various facilities used by bootloaders to go
away, or at worst be moved to the wrapper.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev