i8259.c spinlocks unnecessary
cort at fsmlabs.com
Sat Jun 29 07:29:29 EST 2002
I looked through the 8259 code and I believe the spinlocks there are
unnecessary. The code is covered by a spinlock when called from irq.c.
I instrumented the code and after running quite some time my code review
matches what I've seen.
Anyone comment? Does someone want to remove them?
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev