Paul Mackerras paulus at
Fri Aug 30 14:24:09 EST 2002

Matt Porter writes:

> I made it an option since we may get undesirable results fiddling
> with that bit on other host bridges.  We *could* leave it that
> way for safety sake on 2.4 and do it all the time on 2.5 and see
> what we break.  Recall that the PCI spec does not define host
> bridge operation, so the CFGA could do just about anything by
> twiddling that bit.

OK, then let's put the `set_cfg_type' field in the hose structure.  It
doesn't really belong in the ppc_md structure.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See

More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list