ppc LE questions (seeking help hand info pointers)
trini at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Sep 21 01:58:25 EST 2001
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:42:39AM -0400, Mark Salisbury wrote:
> question 1. are there already existing patch sets (rejected from
> mainline inclusion) available for use as a starting point?
There was a bit of work, just for the kernel. Nothing on the toolchain
> question 2. if 1, what is the primary reason for rejection.
Being a LE & BE arch becomes a giant PITA for no gain.
> question 3. is there a general issue of endian safety in linux (I would
> think not) or just in the ppc-specific code?
In theory the generic code is endian safe, by and large. The arch/ppc and
include/asm-ppc stuff assumes BE.
> question 4. assuming I was willing to deliver a clean, complete LE
> enabling patch (including devices that are relevant to me), as a compile
> time config option and maintain that patch, what would be the primary
> obstacle to inclusion in the main line.
The objection to being an arch that attempts to support both LE and BE.
Tom Rini (TR1265)
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev