hfs cdrom broken in 2.4.13pre

[Alan Cox]

> > was code in block layer to provide broken FS's compatibility and that
> > code has been removed, then we must fix the FS. Who's HFS maintainer ?
>
> Orphaned I think. But I agree it should be fixed. Using loopback on the
> sly doesn't sound a lot cleaner than a reblocking hack in the HFS driver
> :-)

Believe me it is a lot lot cleaner. It isnt just HFS, its almost all file
systems. If you add a generic reblocking layer it ends up looking remarkably
like the loopback driver

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/