why XOR ext2_set_bit?
Sébastien Côté
scote1 at matrox.com
Thu Mar 15 09:28:36 EST 2001
Hi,
I just had a problem writing to a file on a ext2 filesystem with my port
of kernel 2.4 on powerpc (G4) running in little-endian. When the
function ext2_set_bit was called by ext2_new_block, it returned
something so I got the warning :
"ext2_new_block bit already set for block 161"
and I was stuck in an infinite loop. I found the definition for the
function in include/asm-ppc/bitops.h as follow:
#define ext2_set_bit(nr, addr) test_and_set_bit((nr) ^ 0x18, addr)
Now my question: Why is "nr" XORed with 0x18 ??? I tried to do this
function on paper and with this XOR, they were always trying to change
the wrong bit. Now, since nobody's been reporting this problem before,
I guess this XOR is ok but I'd really like to understand it's utility to
correct things on my side (for now, I just removed it and everything
appears to be fine).
Could someone give me an explanation?
Thanks,
Sébastien Côté
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list