why there is NOT support for FADS board ?
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Tue Feb 20 04:57:31 EST 2001
In message <033b01c09a52$e88f11e0$bf0102c8 at sc.mcel.mot.com> you wrote:
>
> I can see supports for MBX, RPXLITE, RPXCLASSIC, etc.
> but why not FADS support in linux ppc ?
Speaking just for myself: I always like to work in environments where
the chance of hardware problems is minimal. I'm making mistakes
enough myself, so I don't need unreliable hardware as a compli-
cation. From what I've seen so far, I don't think the FADS board is
the most reliable piece of hardware around. It may have been even
worse, with improvements lately. I don't really know - and I don't
care any more. I've been burned once, that's enough.
I guess others feel similar.
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd at denx.de
Man is the best computer we can put aboard a spacecraft ... and the
only one that can be mass produced with unskilled labor.
-- Wernher von Braun
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list