mmu_context_overflow
christopher.murtagh at wcg.mcgill.ca
christopher.murtagh at wcg.mcgill.ca
Fri Feb 16 16:40:56 EST 2001
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote (regarding mmu
overflow):
>No, I don't think you should worry about these. those messages simply
>need that the kernel ran out of VSIDs and had to re-assign them all. It's
>perfectly harmless as long as it doesn't happen too often.
Thanks very much for the info Ben. So far I have only seen it once. Knock
on wood.
regarding eth0 transmit timeouts:
>I'm more concerned about your network problems however. I beleive the
>chip is a GMAC chip with a 5201 PHY (can you confirm ?). With 2.2.18,
>you should not have transmit timeouts. If you have some, then there's
>either a bug in the driver (which seemed to be rock-solid so far) or, we
>are hitting a HW issue.
>
>Does the gmac driver display some version informations when the kernel boots ?
Here is the info I pulled out of my last boot log:
eth0: GMAC at 00:30:65:44:e2:ee, driver v1.3k2
eth0 PHY ID: 0x00406212
eth0 Found Broadcom BCM5201 PHY
I usually get 3 of these a day, sometimes 2, sometimes 4, mostly they
coincide with really high traffic periods (150k http request per hour -
this server is 99% http traffic), but I have had some at what seem to be
low traffic periods (but this is rare).
I haven't seen this on any of our other G4s, but none of them are taking
on anywhere near that amount of traffic. Do you suspect it might be a
hardware problem with this particular machine?
Cheers,
Chris
info about the machine: http://www.mcgill.ca/secretaboutbox/
--
Christopher Murtagh
Webmaster / Web Communications Group
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec
Canada
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list