Changes to PPC Linux required for GCC 3.1

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

>
>I think the reason this wasn't applied is that Paul said something about
>thiws being horriyingly ugly.  Corey, can you post a patch that changes
>RELOC(x) into a function and nothing else? :)

I prefer this beeing resolved at compile time. The reason Paul didn't want
it at first is because he didn't want a workaround for a pre-release gcc
bug. Since this is becoming a "feature", it makes sense to get the
workaround. Paulus will confirm or not what I'm saying though...

Ben.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/