kernel course no. 1
Benjamin Herrenschmidt
benh at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Aug 31 01:29:04 EST 2001
>
>Hello,
>I am checking kernel source from penguinppc.org (development tree), and
try to
>boot it... but, when I checked code in head_4xx.h I saw that code from
>'_start' doesn't jump to 'start_here' because of 'strange coding' (sorry, but
>it really seems strange to me ;-):
>
> li r4,MSR_KERNEL
> lis r3,start_kernel at h
> ori r3,r3,start_kernel at l
> mtspr SRR0,r3
> mtspr SRR1,r4
> rfi /* enable MMU and jump to start_kernel */
>
>In this part it stops... why don't we just use 'bl start_here'? I tried
and it
>works, but seems strange why would it be so complicated without a reason. Is
>there a reason? :-)
Yes, and a big one ! Normally, at that point, you are running with MMU off,
you need to re-enable it before entering the kernel, that's what the "rfi"
does for you when the proper value is set into SRR1.
>Next thing I would like to know is in 'start_here' at the end... it jumps to
>function (?) named '2f'. I can't find what is this '2f' (with other words - I
>can't figure out, where code continues)?
At this point, it disables the MMU. That is it uses the same trick as
above to get the address of the label "2". The writing xb and xf when "x"
is a number means respectively "previous label number x" and "next label
number x". In your case, it loads SRR0 with the address of the label "2:"
just below, SRR1 with an MSR value in which the MMU translations are off,
and then do the rfi.
>OK, just one more thing... is there any 'roadmap' or some other kind of
>documentation that would describe this early stage of kernel booting?
(like at
>first it is '_start', which do this and this and then jumps to 'start_here'
>which does initizalization of... etc etc).
>
>That would be it, thanks for answeres in advance...
>Jure
>
>
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list