another difference in gcc (2v) ?
florin at bnv-bamberg.de
Thu Apr 12 02:23:52 EST 2001
Sorry I jump in like this w/o atually knowing what you're talking about
(I'm not familiar with PPC assembly language, and I didn't follow this
thread), but I just heard the words "exception table" and "incorrect" and
this attracted my attention: I'm now sure whether it's the same problem
(or at least a similar one), but I had some strange segmentation faults
while throwing some C++ exceptions in a project I'm working on. The same
code runs without problems on an i586...
I wasn't able to fix them yet since I was in pressure of time, but one day
I'll have to face them again -- and I'm really not looking forward to
Does this relate? If not, I'm sorry for the rude interruption...
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, David Edelsohn wrote:
> "subf" and "srawi" only set condition codes if the "Rc" bit is
> set, e.g. "subf." and "srawi."
> Given the two sequences of code you have sent, I think the problem
> is tht the exception table is being initialized with incorrect labels.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev