xf 4.0.0/1 with rage II/rage pro -- should the ati driver work?

Michael Schmitz schmitz at zirkon.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de
Tue Sep 26 04:37:12 EST 2000


> On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > >  > 	/* hack */
> > >  > 	pScrn->videoRam = 2048;
> > >  > [...]
> > >  > The hack to unconditionally set pScrn->videoRam to 2M should be removed,
> > >
> > >
> > > The rsync of atimach64ppc.c I got earlier today doesn't have this
> > > unconditonal assignment hack anymore.  The hardwired vram setting
> >
> > It was too obvious to go undetected for long :-). Now if the kernel
> > framebuffer driver (atyfb, and don't check the 'no video driver' option
> > when using BootX) reportds the correct vram size the X server should see
> > the correct size as well.
>
> However, I see a problem. Atyfb reports the video RAM size minus the cursor
> area. If you divide that number of bytes by 1024 to get pScrn->videoRam, you
> end up with 1 MB too few :-(

Rather 1k too few if you mean the truncation error - or is the cursor area
really 1 MB?

My LT Pro reports 8188 kB. Seems I can live without the four that have
gone missing.

	Michael


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/





More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list