ld bug?

[Takashi Oe]

On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 mikejc at us.ibm.com wrote:

> I believe that ld has done the right thing here.

Yes, right!  It's my thinko.  Paul had explained to me in details
yesterday.

I still don't understand why (seemingly) completely unrelated change
results in a bad kernel (just idling doing nothing), however  :(


Thanks!

Takashi Oe


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/