ld bug?

[Kaoru Fukui]

From: Takashi Oe <toe at unlserve.unl.edu>
To: linuxppc-dev at lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: ld bug?
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 21:28:46 -0500 (CDT)

>
> Hi,

> as opposed to c03ac3e0 used in vmlinux.  So, it appears that ld or
> something is acting up.  I've tried various version of binutils from
> 2.9.1.0.990418 to 2.10.0.18, but all have produced the same output.
> Except for 2.9.1.0.990414, all 2.10.x versions that I tried are from
> ftp://devel.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/R5/RPMS/.
>
> gcc is 2.95.3-2c (also from fsirl directory).
>
> If I change some totally (and seemingly) unrelated files a bit, vmlinux
> produced may be correct.  I tried to look at if any section's size
> matters, but I don't see any pattern unfortunately.
>

Lastest binutls is  2.10.0.24.

It's there.

ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/support/hjl/binutils/

Kaoru

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/