apmd and other archs
Michael Schmitz
schmitz at opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de
Fri Nov 24 05:40:04 EST 2000
> > Good answer. I'd have used a symlink to some writeable directory on the
> > root fs, mainly because using /proc all over the place tends to confuse
> > Unix admins with no Linux experience. Let's not fall into the Solaris trap
> > (you are in a maze of twisty little config files, all different from the
> > rest of Unix').
>
> At boot, before the first mount command executes, there may be _no_
> writable directory and there may be none for a while, and you have the
> problem of having an existing non-empty /etc/mtab (or equivalent) from a
The init scripts of all distributions but SuSE handle this just fine
(mount -n). At least SuSE seems to mount the root fs rw from the start,
which causes all sorts of pain if you want to boot into a RedHat system
using the SuSE rescue disk. No idea how SuSE copes with readonly root fs.
Anyway, this wasn't the issue initially. It seems /proc/apm should be
doable on PPC for programs that don't use apmlib, and the apmlib glue code
takes care of the others.
> non-clean shutdown which you would have to erase before the first mount is
> done (adding another funky option to mount). Unless you make some kind of
> ramdisk compulsory, which might not be bad idea after all with current
> memory sizes.
Yeah, like Linux will never run on my old 4 MB Mac anyway.
Michael
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list