[patch] VRAM detection in controlfb
nicoya at apia.dhs.org
Mon Jun 5 01:08:39 EST 2000
At 2:09 AM -0500 6/4/2000, Michel Lanners wrote:
>On 3 Jun, this message from Franz Sirl echoed through cyberspace:
>> if you don't mind, would you try to replace the "dcbi" assembler
>> in the detection code with "dcbf" instructions? It seems Dan inherited
>> I had in the platinumfb driver...
>Sure, no problem.
>In what sense is that a bug, and what would be the symptom? I know close
>to nothing about PPC assembler, and fully understanding the detection
>code might help fix the detection problems we still have in some
dcbi = data cache block invalidate. If you do this on a dirty cache block,
data will be lost.
dcbf = data cache block flush. If you do this on a block that isn't in a
coherent state, data will be lost.
If you have a block that's both dirty and incoherent... well, don't do that. :)
btw, my mail server messed up and I got bounced off the list a few weeks
back, have I missed anything interesting?
Cheers - Tony :)
Tony Mantler Renaissance Nerd Extraordinaire nicoya at apia.dhs.org
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada http://nicoya.feline.pp.se/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev