Help with string.S
David Edelsohn
dje at watson.ibm.com
Tue Jul 11 01:17:02 EST 2000
>>>>> Daniel Marmier writes:
Daniel> IIRC, I have sent you a patch that did the right thing for 16-byte
Daniel> cache lines at time of 2.3.99-pre5. So this is a known problem and
Daniel> had already been fixed. Of course, if there are caches with 64 or
Daniel> 128 byte lines, some more work needs to be done.
Current 64-bit PowerPC chips use a cacheline size of 128 bytes.
Assuming 32 bytes or 32 bytes and 16 bytes or any small number of values
is a mistake.
David
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list