Franz Sirl wrote: > >Is this a known (and hopefully already fixed ;-) bug, or should it go > >directly to gcc-bugs at gcc.gnu.org? > > I believe this is fixed in my current gcc-2.95.2 RPM-set available on > <ftp://devel.linuxppc.org/users/fsirl/>. It is fixed, thanks a lot! Yours, Albrecht. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/